Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - cmodpuser

Pages: [1]
1
OD/WEK & JAVA API / REST API
« on: February 02, 2022, 12:44:09 PM »
Does anyone know if REST API can be implemented using ODWEK and WebSphere environment that is running Content Navigator?

2
z/OS Server / CICS Client configuration non-zero port
« on: April 01, 2019, 01:24:46 PM »
Is there a way to configure CICS client to use a non-zero port without entering ARS1 ipaddress:port?
This is for the second instance on the same LPAR.

3
z/OS Server / OD77 vs OD77HW
« on: March 14, 2019, 07:54:38 AM »
We have all apps defined with OD77 compression for CMOd of z/OS. Can OD77 HW be used for z13? What are the hardware requirements for OD77HW? Would that offer performance benefits.
We do not have zEDC cards.
 

4
I couldn't find this requirement documented anywhere, but when we upgraded OnDemand on z/OS fro V9 to V9.5
the AFP load jobs started getting this violations:
ICH408I USER(.......
  CSFRNG CL(CSFSERV )                           
  INSUFFICIENT ACCESS AUTHORITY                 
  ACCESS INTENT(READ   )  ACCESS ALLOWED(NONE   )
ICH408I USER(........
  CSFIQA CL(CSFSERV )                           
  INSUFFICIENT ACCESS AUTHORITY                 
  ACCESS INTENT(READ   )  ACCESS ALLOWED(NONE   )
Has someone else run into this?
We disabled SAF authorization checking for the CSFRNG services as recommended in
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.csfb300/ctlserv.htm
but it appears we will have to grant read access for CSFIQA profile to all userids that load AFP reports,


5
Ed, Is OnDemand V9.0 and V9.5 for z/OS compatible with ACIF 4.6 HQN4460 that is shipped with newer version of PSF?
Or should we still use HQN4450 instead?

6
z/OS Server / OnDemand z/OS V9 compatibility with z/OS 2.3
« on: November 09, 2017, 11:23:08 AM »
Hello,
I know OnDemand V9 is no longer supported but I still would like to know is its' compatible with z/OS 2.3 considering all the OAM changes in in z/OS 2.3.
Does anyone know or tested this?
Thank you,
Margaret

7
Content Navigator / CIWEB1008 Repository not available in ICN
« on: February 17, 2017, 12:53:24 PM »
Has anyone run into the issue with CIWEB1008  Repository not available when creating a new repository?

This is the error in the log:
com.ibm.ecm.struts.actions.od.ODLogonAction.createODConnection()
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: com/ibm/edms/od/ODConfig.MAX_TRACELOG_SIZE

ICN is 2.0.3, ODWEK on AIX V9.0, CMOD server on z/OS V9.0.

Is there anything else needs to be done to configure ODWEK for ICN after the install besides adding LIBPATH and CLASSPATH?

8
WEBI interface / ODWEK 9.5 and latest WEBI 1.4.0.5 FP5.6 compatibility
« on: October 13, 2016, 12:12:31 PM »
Does anyone know of the latest WEBi fixpack works with ODWEK 9.5?

9
z/OS Server / arstblsp
« on: October 30, 2015, 02:07:03 PM »
Trying to run arstblsp and getting arsusec failure:
 
BPXBATCH sh /usr/lpp/ars/V8R4M0/bin/arstblsp -a 3 -g 'System Log' -u 'ARSADM' -p 'xxxxxxxx'

The userexit >/usr/lpp/ars/V8R4M0/bin/exits/arsusec< failed.  rc=3  Srvr-><-   
An error occurred.  Contact your System Administrator and/or consult the System

Messages in system log:

BPXP015I HFS PROGRAM /usr/lpp/ars/V8R4M0/bin/arstblsp IS NOT MARKED 
PROGRAM CONTROLLED.                                                 
BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST BE CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON)     
PROCESSING.                                                         

BPXF024I (XXX) ARSUSEC.ARSZUXF fetch for ARSUSECX failed RC=00060002     
BPXF024I (XXX) ARSUSEC.ARSZUXF Diag 871B1110 10DCB628 10DCB6B0 FC 730     
00030DAD59C3C5C500000001                                                 
ARS0161E ARSADM THE USEREXIT >/USR/LPP/ARS/V8R4M0/BIN/EXITS/ARSUSEC< 731 
 FAILED.  RC=3  SRVR-><-                 

The permissions for arstblsp are 755 rwxr-xr-x       
Extended attributes are:
Shared address space  . . 1         
APF authorized  . . . . . 1         
Program controlled  . . . 0         
Shared library  . . . . . 0         

Tried setting arstblsp to Program Controlled and got different failure:

ICH422I THE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BECOME UNCONTROLLED.                 
BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST REMAIN CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON)
PROCESSING.                                                         
CSV042I REQUESTED MODULE DSNHDECP NOT ACCESSED. THE MODULE IS NOT   
PROGRAM CONTROLLED                                                 
CSV028I ABEND306-42  JOBNAME=ARSARSSL  STEPNAME=STEP1               

I don't have issues running any other programs: ARSDOC, ARSMAINT, ARSEXOAM.
Has anyone come across this?

                               

10
z/OS Server / ARS0131E DCB9003 NO LOGICAL PLACE TO RETRIEVE OBJECT
« on: June 05, 2015, 10:15:45 AM »
Has anyone seen the following errors: ARS0131E DCB9003 NO LOGICAL PLACE TO RETRIEVE OBJECT?
We are running V8.4.0 and we don't use cache  (all Application Groups are defined as Cache Data No). The AG definitions were generated for us by IBM services for migration from V2. We have maximum number of OAM threads defined in ars.cfg: ARS_NUM_OAMSRVR=30.         
Thanks,
Margaret

11
Hello,
We still use V2 and decided to eliminate weekly IPLs. On week three OnDemand GUI users have started receiving intermitent 'Connection Could not be established to the server'
I can't open a problem to IBM since V2 is off support even though we are still paying for it.
the OnDemand IODLDFLT defaults have max clients and max sockets set to 300. The EZACICD macro has 100 of NUMSOCK specified.
The last stats message in MSGUSR was: OD390 Max Concurrent Users   LoggedOn=128   Active=110.
I am suspecting that 'in memory' replica of the IODSRVR TS Queue may have something to do with it.
Omegamon was showing a warning: TDQU Dest: ODCU queue length is 83.
We ended up recycling CICS and it cleared up the problem.

Does anyone remember any limitations of that sort in V2 or had similar issues in the past?

Thanks,
Margaret
   

12
z/OS Server / Upgrade from 8.4.0
« on: November 05, 2014, 08:44:25 AM »
Does anyone know if we can migrate from 8.4.0 of OnDemand for z/OS directly to 9.5?
Can't find any mention of migration path in 9.5 documentation.
Thanks!

Pages: [1]