Messages

196

Report Indexing / Re: Indexing a .txt file

« on: May 02, 2013, 07:46:20 AM »

When defining the folder you can create a field of type "Text Search".  This will allow the user to search for non indexed text in every document when entering their search criteria and will return any document that contains the requested text.  The problem with this is it basically does a full tablespace scan every time you run this and can drive CPU use through the roof and kill response times.

197

MP Server / Re: LDAP setup?

« on: April 09, 2013, 10:03:12 AM »

Shannan,
 I recently did a POC with LDAP on our z/OS server.  It took a while to get the parms correct but for Non-SSL we have something like this:

 ARS_LDAP_SERVER=111.11.11.111
ARS_LDAP_PORT=389
ARS_LDAP_BASE_DN=dc=yyy,dc=zzznet
ARS_LDAP_BIND_DN=cn=bsmith,ou=Company1,ou=Division1,ou=ITDEPT,dc=yyy,dc=zzznet
ARS_LDAP_BIND_DN_PWD=password
ARS_LDAP_BIND_ATTRIBUTE=userPrincipalName
ARS_LDAP_MAPPED_ATTRIBUTE=sAMAccountName
ARS_LDAP_ALLOW_ANONYMOUS=FALSE
ARS_LDAP_OD_AUTHORITY_FALLBACK=FALSE
ARS_LDAP_REFERRALS=FALSE

This configuration would require a user to enter in a userid in the form of userid@yyy.zzznet.  The initial BIND DN is bsmith which would have been a service account name and password provided to you by your LDAP/AD administrators.  Upon successful logon verification of userid@yyy.zzznet LDAP would return that user?s sAMAccountName which would be just userid and look for that same userid in CMOD.

198

Windows Client / Re: Creating a search via the CMOD ADMIN client

« on: March 05, 2013, 01:08:49 PM »

No that kind of search isn't possible using the admin client.  As Frederick stated that's only possible by running a SPUFI on you database for the TYPE column in your ARSAG table.

199

Windows Client / Re: Full Report Browse

« on: March 01, 2013, 08:11:09 AM »

It Doesn't matter which one you turn on.  I have a feeling they're both pointing to the same table as that when I check one off (ie in the User) the other shows as checked off(ie in the folder).

200

Windows Client / Re: Full Report Browse

« on: February 28, 2013, 11:58:06 AM »

If your load gets broken up into mulitple documents, full report browse allows you to see all the documents in the original, all in one, document.  For example if you load a document with 12 statements and your indexing breaks on account # causing it to store it as 12 separate documents,  If you select one of those then click on "Full Report Browse" CMOD will present all 12 statements as one document.  We've found this handy for some of our users who have to do end of run summaries and such.
 Both the folder and user checkboxes do the same thing.  If you check off one, the other will show checked off.  It can be used for both specific users or for a group.

201

z/OS Server / Re: How do you determine which messages are captured in your system log?

« on: February 28, 2013, 11:40:56 AM »

When I go through the user to add permission to an application I get msg#56 and 36(viewable)  .  If I go through the Application group to add permissions for a user I get msg # 56, and 55 (viewable).

202

z/OS Server / Re: How do you determine which messages are captured in your system log?

« on: February 27, 2013, 01:16:13 PM »

The only places I've seen where you can control what's being logged is in the Application Group "Message Logging" tab and in the System Parameters.  Selection isn't by message # but by action.

203

Windows Client / Re: Download Windows Client

« on: February 27, 2013, 12:45:35 PM »

IBM has moved the clients from out in the open to behind their walls.  If you have an IBM ID you can get them here:
http://www-933.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/

204

z/OS Server / Re: CMOD for z/OS 7.1 and using PDF indexer

« on: February 25, 2013, 09:36:53 AM »

Thanks for the response.  We're just diving into the world of PDF indexing now and will have to see if that's an option for our user.

205

z/OS Server / Re: CMOD for z/OS 7.1 and using PDF indexer

« on: February 22, 2013, 07:04:20 AM »

HI Ed,
Does you statement still hold true for V8.5?

206

MP Server / Re: ARSLOAD DAEMON QUESTION.

« on: February 15, 2013, 08:48:41 AM »

 "my question is..will arsload be able to specify the OnDemand application group via the app name?"
If you have a one to one relationship between application group and application you can get away with just specifying the application group but I don't think you can just specify application.

207

z/OS Server / Re: Application group does not exist

« on: January 16, 2013, 11:23:57 AM »

The message you get seems to indicate that it isn't a real problem with the space.  Your message states: "The application group >PROD JCL2< does not exist.."  Which tells me it is pulling the application group name just fine from your original load statement, otherwise you would see >PROD<.  Silly question, did you check the permissions on the application group?  While Admin will normally have administrative access to all application groups, if the application group is specifically named in the permissions for Admin without "Add" permission the load will fail.
  My second guess would be the arsuupdt exit.  Has that been modified for your system and does it handle spaces in the application group correctly?

208

Other / Re: XML files

« on: November 16, 2012, 11:17:18 AM »

By "viewing of the document failed"  what do you mean?  Do you get an error message, is the document unreadable, or is IE not even trying to open the document?

209

z/OS Server / Re: On demand and DB2 V10 performance

« on: September 05, 2012, 05:00:15 AM »

Thanks, that's good to know.  We'll be going to DB2 10 within a year.

210

z/OS Server / Printing AFP documents using ODF V8.5

« on: August 15, 2012, 08:29:32 AM »

Is anyone using ODF V8.5 to print AFP embedded documents with a banner page on a mainframe printer?  We have a few line data documents that get loaded with Pagedefs and Formdefs for online viewing.  Viewing works fine however if we have ODF send the document , now AFP embedded, to the printer and attempt to use a banner page it fails at the printer.  We're curious if anyone is succesfully printing this way.