1
Windows Client / Re: Getting SSL working on client side - what's the secret?
« on: June 12, 2019, 12:22:22 PM »
No luck with that. It would be really really nice if the client had some kind of log to help troubleshoot.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Windows Client / Re: Getting SSL working on client side - what's the secret?
« on: June 10, 2019, 12:13:55 PM »
Hey Ed - thanks. Am I correct in thinking you imported your server's cert to the client's keydb?
3
Windows Client / Getting SSL working on client side - what's the secret?
« on: June 07, 2019, 12:55:44 PM »
We're trying to enable SSL for CMOD. We've gotten the server successfully running and I can see arssockd listening on the SSL port we specified. Not having as much luck on the client side. I have tried every permutation of ports (secure, unsecure, 0) and checking the "Use Secure Sockets layer" option. I've confirmed the client .kdb and .sth file are in the client's config subfolder. Nothing works....so what am I missing?
this is V10.1 client
Also, changed the Host Name in the client from "myserver" to FQDN "myserver.mydomain.com" and really thought that was going to be the magic bullet -- but still no dice.
Anyone have any suggestions?
this is V10.1 client
Also, changed the Host Name in the client from "myserver" to FQDN "myserver.mydomain.com" and really thought that was going to be the magic bullet -- but still no dice.
Anyone have any suggestions?
4
Content Navigator / Re: ICN and CMOD on mixed platforms
« on: February 21, 2017, 07:21:02 AM »
Not documented in the Navigator installation https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEUEX_2.0.3/com.ibm.installingeuc.doc/eucde013.htm
5
Content Navigator / Re: ICN and CMOD on mixed platforms
« on: January 30, 2017, 08:57:33 AM »
Thanks for the info and sorry this reply took so long - for some reason I don't get notified when someone replies to a post.
We have gotten it working and, ultimately, there were two main causes. One, installing to all the default paths seems to be a requirement. Second, you have to install the GSKit, which is not a documented step in the info center.
We have gotten it working and, ultimately, there were two main causes. One, installing to all the default paths seems to be a requirement. Second, you have to install the GSKit, which is not a documented step in the info center.
6
Report Indexing / Re: Performance of ACIF vs PDF Indexer
« on: January 30, 2017, 08:47:45 AM »
Attached is the output from the load of the compressed PDF. Let me know if you want to see the uncompressed also.
7
Report Indexing / Performance of ACIF vs PDF Indexer
« on: January 27, 2017, 08:38:52 AM »
We ran some tests yesterday and were surprised shocked by the results - wondering if anyone can explain the gap?
We took an AFP file that contained 13K+ documents (65k+ pages) and converted it to a PDF with PPDs.
We loaded both documents into identical applications (except the indexer, obviously). The ACIF indexer took two minutes. The PDF indexer took 45! And it pegged the server CPU the whole time. We thought perhaps this was because the PDF had compression enabled during the conversion, so we converted it again without compression....that one took 51 minutes to load and again killed the CPU for a large portion of that time.
We fully expected there to be some lag with the PDF, but not to this degree. Is this just the way it is, or are there perhaps some tweaks we missed that would bring this more in line with the AFP? I think we all expected it would take no more than 10 minutes to load.
OnDemand 9.5.06 running on Windows
We took an AFP file that contained 13K+ documents (65k+ pages) and converted it to a PDF with PPDs.
We loaded both documents into identical applications (except the indexer, obviously). The ACIF indexer took two minutes. The PDF indexer took 45! And it pegged the server CPU the whole time. We thought perhaps this was because the PDF had compression enabled during the conversion, so we converted it again without compression....that one took 51 minutes to load and again killed the CPU for a large portion of that time.
We fully expected there to be some lag with the PDF, but not to this degree. Is this just the way it is, or are there perhaps some tweaks we missed that would bring this more in line with the AFP? I think we all expected it would take no more than 10 minutes to load.
OnDemand 9.5.06 running on Windows
8
Content Navigator / ICN and CMOD on mixed platforms
« on: October 03, 2016, 06:11:39 AM »
Hello ODUG!
I've been unable to get ICN to connect to CMOD. We have ICN deployed on Linux (Websphere 8.5.5), and CMOD installed on Windows. ICN 2.0.3 fp 6 and CMOD 9.5.0 fixpack 6.
I've installed the Linux version of CMOD into a file mount the Websphere server can access, and it is this path I've configured in the ICN profile screen. I've also added the custom property ODWEK_INSTALL_DIR in the CMOD section of ICN admin pointing to this shared location.
When I try to connect to the CMOD repository, I get the oh-so-generic CIWEB2001 error, and I've not seen anything more helpful in the ICN log. There's no firewall blocking it.
CMOD server is running and my own CMOD client for windows connects fine.
Anyone done a mixed platform deploy like this before? Any suggestions?
I've been unable to get ICN to connect to CMOD. We have ICN deployed on Linux (Websphere 8.5.5), and CMOD installed on Windows. ICN 2.0.3 fp 6 and CMOD 9.5.0 fixpack 6.
I've installed the Linux version of CMOD into a file mount the Websphere server can access, and it is this path I've configured in the ICN profile screen. I've also added the custom property ODWEK_INSTALL_DIR in the CMOD section of ICN admin pointing to this shared location.
When I try to connect to the CMOD repository, I get the oh-so-generic CIWEB2001 error, and I've not seen anything more helpful in the ICN log. There's no firewall blocking it.
CMOD server is running and my own CMOD client for windows connects fine.
Anyone done a mixed platform deploy like this before? Any suggestions?
Pages: [1]