Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - htees

Pages: [1] 2
1
Content Navigator / 508 Compliant documents from ICN
« on: August 28, 2020, 10:41:40 AM »
Hi all:  I was asked to check if there is anyone using any conversion tools with ICN to present/convert stored AFP documents into accessible PDFs (508 Compliant). We are currently running CMOD 10.1.0.5  and ICN 2.0.3(upgrading soon to 3.2).  Is there ICN add on or other vendor component for this?

Thanks for any help.

HT

2
Hi folks, we are periodically having load failures when an output file contains LARGE  AFP documents(hundreds of pages) and said file is processed automatically through ARSLOADP.

2020-05-15 00:07:17.914289: ARS1412E The document size of >2285875577< bytes exceeds the maximum size allowed of >2147483647< bytes.
 2020-05-15 00:07:17.914849: ARS1146I Loaded 2561 rows into the database
 2020-05-15 00:07:17.915274: ARS4311E Loading failed
 2020-05-15 00:08:23.509692: ARS4320I Unloading started
 2020-05-15 00:08:25.176608: ARS4321I Unloading of data was successful


I understand that the message states we are exceeding a 'maximum size', but yet we can load the file MANUALLY by creating a batch load through SAR (CA product) and resubmitting the output to the SAME sysout class ARSLOADP is using.

Thoughts on why the Initial load through ARSLOADP fails?  Are there PARMS that need to be looked at?
What are the maximum sizes of a load allowed?

ZOS - 4.26
CMOD  - 10.1.0.5
Large Object support is used

Thanks for any help offered.  HT



 

3
OD/WEK & JAVA API / WAS 8.5.5.16 - Compatible with CMOD 10.1?
« on: March 06, 2020, 11:14:32 AM »
Just a quick check whether there are any considerations that need to be looked into when we upgrade to WAS 8.5.5.16 on our servers.

CMOD 10.1.0.5
ODWEK 9.5
ICN 2.0.3 , yes we know....out of support

Thanks for any advice, info, help, or cheerleading!

HT

4
If RECORDRANGE is longer valid, what is our option?  Do we just remove it and hope that the indexer will find our triggers in the position where they exist?
For the below definition, we are telling it to look in a specific  location......does it now just look at the entire page?

TRIGGER2=*,4,X'D1D6C2D5C1D4C5',(TYPE=GROUP,RECORDRANGE=(25,35))

Or do we now just have to evaluate each report for better trigger setup?


5
WHAT i HAVE FOUND TODAY.......

Ed's response "Some restrictions previously unenforced now are."

Truth.......it appears some things that were a default (I.E. excluding quotes around index names) and other parms that may have been ignored by previous versions (I.E.  GROUPMAXPAGES values)  are now throwing errors and causing loads to fail.

It appears there is a new indexing sheriff in town, and the 390 indexer is a bit more discerning.

6
using 390 indexer.   Started moving RECORDRANGE to it's own line, and it started working....... is comma no longer a good separator?

7
Hi Folks; One day in to the 10.1.0.5 upgrade we are getting failures for Line data Type reports with the below error:

  ARS5481I TRIGGER1=*,1,X'F1',(TYPE=GROUP)                                     /* 1            */
 ARS5481I TRIGGER2=*,4,X'D1D6C2D5C1D4C5',(TYPE=GROUP,RECORDRANGE=(25,35))     /* JOBNAME      */
ARS5488E INVALID INDEXING PARM. ERROR OCCURS NEAR RECORDRANGE
 ARS5481I FIELD1=0,14,8,(TRIGGER=2,BASE=0)
 ARS5481I FIELD2=0,59,8,(TRIGGER=2,BASE=0)
 ARS5481I INDEX1=X'D1D6C2D5C1D4C5',FIELD1,(TYPE=GROUP,BREAK=YES)              /* JOBNAME      */
 ARS5481I INDEX2=X'D7D6E2E3C9D5C76DC4C1E3C5',FIELD2,(TYPE=GROUP,BREAK=NO)     /* POSTING_DATE */
 ARS5481I DCFPAGENAMES=NO


Do you see any issues with the indexing code here?

8
z/OS Server / ARS5488E INVALID INDEXING PARM. ERROR OCCURS NEAR RECORDRANGE
« on: December 09, 2019, 11:21:31 AM »
Hi Folks; we are getting failures for Line data Type reports with the below error:

  ARS5481I TRIGGER1=*,1,X'F1',(TYPE=GROUP)                                     /* 1            */
 ARS5481I TRIGGER2=*,4,X'D1D6C2D5C1D4C5',(TYPE=GROUP,RECORDRANGE=(25,35))     /* JOBNAME      */
 ARS5488E INVALID INDEXING PARM. ERROR OCCURS NEAR RECORDRANGE
 ARS5481I FIELD1=0,14,8,(TRIGGER=2,BASE=0)
 ARS5481I FIELD2=0,59,8,(TRIGGER=2,BASE=0)
 ARS5481I INDEX1=X'D1D6C2D5C1D4C5',FIELD1,(TYPE=GROUP,BREAK=YES)              /* JOBNAME      */
 ARS5481I INDEX2=X'D7D6E2E3C9D5C76DC4C1E3C5',FIELD2,(TYPE=GROUP,BREAK=NO)     /* POSTING_DATE */
 ARS5481I DCFPAGENAMES=NO


Do you see any issues with the indexing code here?

9
General / Re: SFTP conversion
« on: November 08, 2019, 12:16:37 PM »
Thanks Justin; We were PURPOSELY transferring in Ascii to make sure we could get the index files in plain text when sent to our Unix directory on the ZOS mainframe. These files are being loaded through the Generic indexing process on CMOD 9.5. If SFTP prefers Binary, what is a good way to get these files either as plain text into our Unix directory, or to process Binary index files?

Thanks HT

10
General / SFTP conversion
« on: November 07, 2019, 01:04:28 PM »
Hi all; Our Company is currently converting our file transfer protocol from FTP to SFTP.  We are finding that pure text index files(used in the generic indexing process) are being re-formatted into one long line of text, rather than a simple text/index file with line feeds to separate each index field or value. 

We tested using a command to( ls /+mode=text) send over the files and they did send correctly, However we have been told by the FTP group that they cannot alter their tool/software and that we will need to come up with a solution. They are using something called ‘IBM Sterling Integrator [Java Based application]’ and they are stating that they cannot make changes toit.

So My question is has anyone else experienced this ? what measures did you take? Is creating some sort of pre-processor my only option?   

Thanks for any insight you can offer.   Harold Thomas 

11
z/OS Server / Re: System Log query
« on: May 17, 2019, 12:57:03 PM »
Thanks for the input !  Has anyone found a way to break up the msg_text in Application Group and as an extra, has anyone added the Foldername as a field/filter?

Thanks again

12
z/OS Server / System Log query
« on: May 16, 2019, 05:46:27 AM »
Good day Folks;  We are curious to find a way to take the Message column of the system log and make it more broken down by the data it contains. Has anyone updated that application group and application to do so? We are wanting to use the log data to feed a performance monitor we are looking into. Thanks for any help you can offer.

HT

13
z/OS Server / ODF justification
« on: February 22, 2019, 09:38:00 AM »
Hey folks; I'm trying to put together a few justification bullets for management on ODF.

Other than report splitting/ distribution, reporting, emailing distributions, re-printing, and monitoring, what are some other cool uses folks are doing  that maybe we can apply to our setup? Does auto distribution likely take a load off of the system by lessening retrievals?

CMOD 9.5.12, using ICN ,  a MULTITUDE of differing documents, reports and formats stored.

Thanks! HT 

14
z/OS Server / Re: Primary Storage node definition
« on: January 23, 2019, 11:19:54 AM »
Let me see if I can break it down further......we have the ONE primary Storage set named as OAM. Within that we have hundreds of collections /primary storage nodes defined. If we have two that are defined for the same application, does the newest now start getting the content stored?

Thanks for the help!

15
z/OS Server / Primary Storage node definition
« on: January 23, 2019, 10:25:24 AM »
quick question on OAM and storage node definition. If we have an application defined in our CRT table setup to send docs to a specific storage node and that node is now overwhelmed by access requests from that and other applications also defined there, is setting up a new storage node definition the thing to do? I.E. 85 applications are sending data to a particular ZORP /storage node but we want to break out 15 of them to another ZORP/storage node.

Will creating a new CRT entry pointing to a different storage node affect retrievals?

Pages: [1] 2