Messages

16

z/OS Server / Re: OAM Object Name Reference

« on: April 07, 2020, 05:14:37 AM »

We've never tired running an OSREQ CHANGE so I couldn't say if that would work for you.  My concern doing that, in our case, would be that the collection name would effectively be changed and I'm certain CMOD wouldn't be able to find the document when trying to recall.

17

z/OS Server / Re: OAM Object Name Reference

« on: April 06, 2020, 04:57:24 AM »

No., I wouldn't recommend doing that.  You'll confuse the heck out of OAM if you do.  OAM has already stored your objects in matching 4K and/or 32K tables for that management class.

18

z/OS Server / Re: V9.5 to V10.1 upgrade - first arsdb command failing.

« on: April 03, 2020, 05:05:33 AM »

Make sure you're calling the correct version with the arsdb command.  While in OMVS type in: echo $PATH   and check the version of the bin directory that shows up.  If it's wrong you need to update your .profile.

19

Windows Client / Re: Automated Report from OnDemand Client

« on: March 18, 2020, 05:19:07 AM »

You don't mention your environment beyond mainframe.  What environment are you on? We're on z/OS and we have System Automation trap crucial CMOD messages like ARS0013E and email them to us when they occur though we could log them in a dataset and send them once a day if need be.
 Also instead of trying to determine the current table name use an ARSDOC query.  We use something like this which you could modify to your requirements.  This lets CMOD determine the correct table for you.
/usr/lpp/ars/V9R5M0/bin/arsdoc query -h OND05P -G "System Log" -f "System Log" -u xxxxxxxx -p /SYSTEM/etc/xxx/arsxxxx.stash
-i "where time_stamp_dt > TIMESTAMP(CURRENT DATE - 7 DAYS) and msg_num= 201"

20

z/OS Server / Re: Large sysout handling

« on: March 06, 2020, 05:59:58 AM »

Most CICS logs have date and time stamps on them.  If you add a GROUPRANGE index for the timestamps you can get the beginning and ending timestamp for the segment.

21

Other / Re: ARSLOAD daemon works for PDF reports but not for text reports

« on: February 07, 2020, 06:07:29 AM »

What platform are you running on?  Version?  Can you share any error messages you are getting?

22

z/OS Server / Re: ARSYSPIN output order doesn't match output queue

« on: January 24, 2020, 06:48:51 AM »

Our ARSYSPIN never seems to have that issue.  What do you have set for JOBBREAK and OUTSEP?  Are you using the ARSSPVIN input exit and, if so, was it modified?

23

z/OS Server / Re: Loads Failing after upgrade to 10.1 - Possible change needed in parms?

« on: December 10, 2019, 09:22:28 AM »

Can you use the ACIF indexer instead of the OS/390?

24

z/OS Server / Re: Loads Failing after upgrade to 10.1 - Possible change needed in parms?

« on: December 10, 2019, 06:05:01 AM »

Yes.  We just ran into this when running test on V 10.1  Previously recordrange was working with OS/390 indexer (despite saying it didn't in 9.5)  At 10.1 applications using it started failing.

25

z/OS Server / Re: Loads Failing after upgrade to 10.1 - Possible change needed in parms?

« on: December 09, 2019, 01:02:44 PM »

Which Indexer are you using?

26

Windows Client / Re: Getting SSL working on client side - what's the secret?

« on: June 13, 2019, 05:20:38 AM »

You can run a trace from the server side and try to connect.  I was able to see from a server trace that the client certificate was bad.  It should give you some clue as to where the process is failing.  If you don't see any error/denial messages in the trace double check that you have all the parms set correctly.
This was a sample of what I saw in the server trace:

04/01/2016 12:02:25:282769 ERROR SYS15104.T182903.RA000.ARNSOCK.SRCCMS.H01(ARNSOCK)(4716)ArcSOCKET_ServerEstablish:socket_init ssl_rc=428 ssl_str=Key entry does not contain a private key

27

z/OS Server / Re: ARS1109E Unable to allocate enough memory

« on: May 30, 2019, 07:00:38 AM »

Can you check the PROC for your CMOD server on z/OS (ARSSOCKD)?  What is the region size set there?

28

Report Indexing / Re: BREAK=YES creates multiple documents but no split happens

« on: May 10, 2019, 12:02:47 PM »

Yes.  By all indications your application seems ok.  To me it seems something with the way the new reports are being generated is off.  There's no paging occurring and indexes past the initial ones are not being found, other than the one based on the floating trigger.  In short it's not finding Trigger 1 after the first occurrence of X'F1'

29

Report Indexing / Re: BREAK=YES creates multiple documents but no split happens

« on: May 09, 2019, 10:50:43 AM »

Ok.  One last try.  Could the new forms have a different LRECL than the original?  I've seen your issue when that occurs as the text starts wrapping.

30

Report Indexing / Re: BREAK=YES creates multiple documents but no split happens

« on: May 09, 2019, 04:59:36 AM »

Ahh too bad was hoping for an easy fix.
Another question.  I see you have a trigger 2 defined but nothing using it.  Is it possible one, or more, of the fields got erroneously changed back to use trigger 1?