Error when trying to uninstall PDF Indexer on 9.5

[jsquizz]

Was tasked last week with uninstalling PDF Indexer on CMOD 9.5..Redhat environment. Seeing this error when i execute the uninstaller. It worked fine on the corresponding library server that we have the PDF Indexer installed on..anyone seen this?

Code: [Select]

[archive@devobj _uninst950pdf]$ ./uninstallodpdf
Invocation of this Java Application has caused an InvocationTargetException. This application will now exit. (LAX)

Stack Trace:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No product for ID=deb1d888-1f12-11b2-a877-ad2b62eef1e6
        at Flexeraanw.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at Flexeraan4.ai(Unknown Source)
        at Flexeraan4.ab(Unknown Source)
        at Flexeraan5.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.Installer.bp(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.Installer.setMetadata(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.InstallerMetaData.setInstaller(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.a3(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.ar(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.consoleInstallMain(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.LifeCycleManager.executeApplication(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.main(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:48)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:600)
        at com.zerog.lax.LAX.launch(Unknown Source)
        at com.zerog.lax.LAX.main(Unknown Source)
This Application has Unexpectedly Quit: Invocation of this Java Application has caused an InvocationTargetException. This application will now exit. (LAX)

[Justin Derrick]

Looks like an intstaller file is bad or inaccessible.

You don't appear to be running as root -- maybe that's why. 

-JD.

[jsquizz]

We figured since the ownership/permissions were archive - that would be fine. but I guess not.

We also tried root, no bueno