Justin, from the time of our conversion to 8.4 from ODE2.1, on the Application Group, a Field called "Description" or "REPORT_TITLE for migrated reports from the old system, has been used as the Application ID field...Under the Mapping, the Database Value was set to the Application Name and the Displayed Value was set to the "Description" of the report (ex Transaction Report)..I've attached a screen shot of an Application Group that was setup at the time of the migration from ODE2.1..The old name (DOC16003) name was kept in place...As you can see, under the REPORT_TITLE field, there are numerous "Applications" defined to it..Up until now, when we've been adding new setups, we've been set up a ONE-TO-ONE with the Application Group name and Application name...We believe this may not be the most "efficient" means of defining things but rather if the Applications have the same parameters (indexes, storage) that they should be setup under ONE Application Group...And if going forward new Applications need to be defined, that are setup the same, they would just be added to that existing Application Group?..Is this thinking correct?...