Author Topic: Application groups and report distribution  (Read 3166 times)

jeffs42885

  • Guest
Application groups and report distribution
« on: January 30, 2012, 02:56:40 PM »
Hello all,

I am looking for some feedback on two scenarios. We use a web connector that calls into OnDemand for document retireval.

Speaking related to performance and response times, Is it better to have 1 application groups that consists of 200 applications, or 25 application groups that each have 8 applications in them. What are the positive and negatives to each scenario?

Justin Derrick

  • IBM Content Manager OnDemand Consultant
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2231
  • CMOD Guru for hire...
    • View Profile
    • Tenacious Consulting
Re: Application groups and report distribution
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2012, 06:38:25 AM »
Fewer Application Groups with more Applications are better.  Each Application Group you 'bind together' at the Folder level is a separate query -- why do 25 queries when you can do just one?.  If it supports your needs, one AG with 200 Apps is the way to go.  You can use the AppID field to filter/restrict your results at query time.

If your volume is high, increase the max rows per table to equal your approximate monthly volume, plus a multiple of your expected annual growth.  (So, 55 million documents a month with 10% annual growth = 60 to 70 million rows per database table.)  This will help keep performance linear as your system grows.

-JD.
IBM CMOD Professional Services: http://TenaciousConsulting.com
Call:  +1-866-533-7742  or  eMail:  jd@justinderrick.com
IBM CMOD Wiki:  https://CMOD.wiki/
FREE IBM CMOD Education & Webinars:  https://CMOD.Training/

Interests: #AIX #Linux #Multiplatforms #DB2 #TSM #SP #Performance #Security #Audits #Customizing #Availability #HA #DR